On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 19:55 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 28/05/2014 at 18:09:43 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote : > > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 17:59 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > On 28/05/2014 at 14:24:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote : > > > > > > config ATMEL_PWM > > > > > > tristate "Atmel AT32/AT91 PWM support" > > > > > > - depends on HAVE_CLK && (AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST) > > > > > > + depends on HAVE_CLK > > > > > > + depends on AVR32 || AT91SAM9263 || AT91SAM9RL || AT91SAM9G45 > > > > > > > > Symbols AT91SAM9263, AT91SAM9RL, and AT91SAM9G45 do not seem to exist in > > > > next-20140528. Should these perhaps be SOC_AT91SAM9263, SOC_AT91SAM9RL, > > > > and SOC_AT91SAM9G45 and/or ARCH_AT91SAM9263, ARCH_AT91SAM9RL, and > > > > ARCH_AT91SAM9G45? > > > > > > I wouldn't bother too much fixing that, this will definitely be remove > > > in 3.17. > > > > Are you talking about: 1) the problem this patch tried to fix; or 2) the > > problem it created? > > > > I'm removing the whole atmel_pwm driver so the CONFIG_ATMEL_PWM symbol > will be gone.
So the patch we're discussing here will never be included in a release? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
