After 07d410e0) serial: sirf: fix spinlock deadlock issue it is no longer
possiblet to compile this driver. The rename of one of the spinlocks is
faulty. After looking at the original patch I believe this is the correct
fix.

Compile tested using ARM's multi_v7_defconfig

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Cc: Barry Song <[email protected]>
Cc: Qipan Li <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
---

Notes:
    Sorry to resend within a few minutes. Patch is identical to parent but the
    subject line has been corrected. The original 'v6' was just utterly
    wrong! This patch is a not-previously-shared patch to fix a build
    regression that appears in tty-next.

 drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.c 
b/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.c
index 236f892..1f2be48 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.c
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static void sirfsoc_uart_rx_dma_complete_tl(unsigned long 
param)
        struct sirfsoc_int_en *uint_en = &sirfport->uart_reg->uart_int_en;
        unsigned long flags;
        struct dma_tx_state tx_state;
-       spin_lock_irqsave(&port->rx_lock, flags);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
        while (DMA_COMPLETE == dmaengine_tx_status(sirfport->rx_dma_chan,
                        sirfport->rx_dma_items[sirfport->rx_completed].cookie, 
&tx_state)) {
                sirfsoc_uart_insert_rx_buf_to_tty(sirfport,
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to