On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 13:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:00:20 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" > <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -7321,6 +7321,7 @@ F: kernel/rcu/torture.c > > > > RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK > > M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > +R: Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> > > L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > S: Supported > > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git > > I like the general principle - knowing who to poke regarding a kernel > change is useful. > > I don't care much whether it's "M:" or "R:", although "R:" carries more > meaning and hence is probably better. > > But why not "Cc:"? That's meaningful too and is more copy-n-paste friendly.
For one, it'd take an extra bit of rework to get_maintainer. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
