On 06/02/2014 01:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 13:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:00:20 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>> @@ -7321,6 +7321,7 @@ F: kernel/rcu/torture.c >>> >>> RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK >>> M: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> >>> +R: Josh Triplett <[email protected]> >>> L: [email protected] >>> S: Supported >>> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git >> >> I like the general principle - knowing who to poke regarding a kernel >> change is useful. >> >> I don't care much whether it's "M:" or "R:", although "R:" carries more >> meaning and hence is probably better. >> >> But why not "Cc:"? That's meaningful too and is more copy-n-paste friendly.
Josh, what are you assuming that Andrew and I did not? -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
