On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 05:51:37PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> [cc list trimmed, security@ added] >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:35:57PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > But yes, having something "real" might be good if the load gets higher, >> >> > right now it's so low that my "sweep pending security patches" task >> >> > usually catches anything pending, which is rare. >> >> >> >> How does one get added to the security@ alias? We've been carrying >> >> this patch in Fedora for a bit now. I'd be happy to help track things >> >> given we get distro security bug reports and such. >> > >> > Just ask on the security@ alias to be added and we can take it from >> > there. >> > >> >> Would it make sense for there to be someone on the security list who >> can assign CVE numbers? > > I'm pretty sure we have that already.
Let me rephrase the question: Would it make sense for someone on the security list to assign CVE numbers? --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/