On Thu 2014-06-12 14:00:32, Kees Cook wrote:
> To support using kernel features that are not compatible with hibernation,
> this creates the "nohibernate" kernel boot parameter to disable both
> hibernation and resume. This allows hibernation support to be a boot-time
> choice instead of only a compile-time choice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> @@ -639,6 +645,11 @@ int hibernate(void)
> {
> int error;
>
> + if (!hibernation_available()) {
> + pr_debug("PM: Hibernation not available.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> lock_system_sleep();
> /* The snapshot device should not be opened while we're running */
> if (!atomic_add_unless(&snapshot_device_available, -1, 0)) {
> @@ -931,6 +945,9 @@ static ssize_t disk_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct
> kobj_attribute *attr,
> char *p;
> int mode = HIBERNATION_INVALID;
>
> + if (!hibernation_available())
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> p = memchr(buf, '\n', n);
> len = p ? p - buf : n;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/user.c b/kernel/power/user.c
> index 98d357584cd6..000b94419182 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/user.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/user.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ static int snapshot_open(struct inode *inode, struct file
> *filp)
> struct snapshot_data *data;
> int error;
>
> + if (!hibernation_available())
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> lock_system_sleep();
>
> if (!atomic_add_unless(&snapshot_device_available, -1, 0)) {
Is EINVAL right error code for "root disabled that option"?
Otherwise it looks ok, you can add my ack with that fixed.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
