On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:45:57 -1000 Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <[email protected]> > > > > The trace_seq functions are rather useful outside of tracing. > > They are? They will be. > Why and where? Why? for NMI safe output. Where? Well, in patch 3. :-) > And why are they still called "trace_xyz()" then? Good point, I'd like to rename it too. It was designed like seq_file, so what about seq_buffer_xxx()? > > That commit message is useless and contains no actual information. Yeah, it was rather weak. It was quick and not a stand alone. It was dependent on reading the rest of the patches. OK, I can update the name and make a better change log on the move. Of course if you hate this patch series, I can just not waste any time on it. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
