Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:41:45PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> +    /*
>> +     * Set up pmu-private data structures for an AUX area
>> +     */
>> +    void *(*setup_aux)              (int cpu, void **pages,
>> +                                     int nr_pages, bool overwrite);
>> +                                    /* optional */
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Free pmu-private AUX data structures
>> +     */
>> +    void (*free_aux)                (void *aux); /* optional */
>
> I was hoping you could replace those with a PERF_CAP_AUX or something
> and then have one generic allocation routine like you provide in the
> subsequent patches.

I need these to allocate pmu-specific SG tables now, which I don't see
how to generalize nicely. User-visible aux_pages are allocated in the
generic rb_alloc_aux().

As for sg tables, the alternative would be to allocate them in the
event::pmu::add() path, which is probably not very good for
performance, unless I'm missing something? Like, I can allocate stuff in
the first add() and then free it in event::destroy().

Or, we can assume a generic sg table format and allocate them in the
generic code, but then we'll need more capabilities to indicate at least
the size of a table entry. PT needs 64 bits per entry, ARM's TMC needs
32 and the non-SG PT will still need some tables. But I'd rather leave
this part to the pmu drivers. What do you think?

Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to