On 07/04/2014 09:57 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Isolation is really rare case so !is_migrate_isolate() is
> likely case. Remove unlikely macro.

Good catch. Why not replace it with likely then? Any difference in the assembly?

> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 8dac0f0..0d4cf7a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone,
>       zone->pages_scanned = 0;
>  
>       __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, migratetype);
> -     if (unlikely(!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype)))
> +     if (!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))
>               __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype);
>       spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
>  }
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to