On Monday, July 07, 2014 12:17:28 PM Lv Zheng wrote: > This patch removes <acpi/acpi.h> inclusions from <linux/sfi_acpi.h> as > <linux/acpi.h> has already included it for CONFIG_ACPI=n builds.
So are patches [1-4/5] only needed to fix this particular issue? > Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/sfi_acpi.h | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/sfi_acpi.h b/include/linux/sfi_acpi.h > index 4723bbf..a6e555c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sfi_acpi.h > +++ b/include/linux/sfi_acpi.h > @@ -63,8 +63,6 @@ > #include <linux/sfi.h> > > #ifdef CONFIG_SFI > -#include <acpi/acpi.h> /* FIXME: inclusion should be removed */ > - > extern int sfi_acpi_table_parse(char *signature, char *oem_id, > char *oem_table_id, > int (*handler)(struct acpi_table_header *)); > @@ -78,7 +76,6 @@ static inline int __init acpi_sfi_table_parse(char > *signature, > return sfi_acpi_table_parse(signature, NULL, NULL, handler); > } > #else /* !CONFIG_SFI */ > - > static inline int sfi_acpi_table_parse(char *signature, char *oem_id, > char *oem_table_id, > int (*handler)(struct acpi_table_header *)) > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
