Hi, Frederic I'd like to take this work unless you are still working on it. I would do some cleanup at first so that it will be much slow for me.
Thanks, Lai On 05/17/2014 12:16 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > So in this version I actually save the cpumask belonging to wq (before > it's intersected against the low level cpumask) in its unbounds attrs. > > But the attrs passed to pwq and worker pools have the low level cpumask > computed against the wq cpumask. > > It makes it easier that way as the wq cpumask itself remains untouched. > It's a user setting so it must stay intact. OTOH the cpumask of pwqs and > worker pools only belong to the implementation so it's the right > place to store the effective cpumask. > > Also wq_update_unbound_numa() is fixed, and cpu_possible_mask() > is restored as a base. Thanks to Lai! > > Thanks, > Frederic > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git > core/workqueue-v5 > --- > > Frederic Weisbecker (4): > workqueue: Reorder sysfs code > workqueue: Create low-level unbound workqueues cpumask > workqueue: Split apply attrs code from its locking > workqueue: Allow modifying low level unbound workqueue cpumask > > Lai Jiangshan (1): > workqueue: Allow changing attributions of ordered workqueues > > > kernel/workqueue.c | 1674 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 1 file changed, 900 insertions(+), 774 deletions(-) > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
