On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > I was figuring that a fair number of the kthreads might eventually > > be using this, not just for the grace-period kthreads. > > Ok makes sense. But can we just rename the cpumask to housekeeping_mask?
That would imply that all no-nohz processors are housekeeping? So all processors with a tick are housekeeping? Could we make that set configurable? Ideally I'd like to have the ability restrict the housekeeping to one processor. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
