On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:31:48PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: > This commit removes a stale comment in rcu/tree.c. > FYI, an updated comment exists a few lines below this. > > Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <[email protected]>
In general, when removing a stale comment, I'd suggest explaining why the comment is stale. Was code removed without removing the corresponding comment, or was code changed such that the comment no longer applies, or...? - Josh Triplett > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > index a1abaa8..e67246e 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > @@ -2211,8 +2211,6 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct > rcu_state *rsp) > /* Adjust any no-longer-needed kthreads. */ > rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1); > > - /* Remove the dead CPU from the bitmasks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */ > - > /* Exclude any attempts to start a new grace period. */ > mutex_lock(&rsp->onoff_mutex); > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->orphan_lock, flags); > -- > 1.9.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
