We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet
kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <benoit.ta...@lip6.fr>
---
Tested by compilation without errors.
drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
index 9bced68..04f2348 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static ushort rx_frag_size = 2048;
module_param(rx_frag_size, ushort, S_IRUGO);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(rx_frag_size, "Size of a fragment that holds rcvd data.");
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(be_dev_ids) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id be_dev_ids[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(BE_VENDOR_ID, BE_DEVICE_ID1) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(BE_VENDOR_ID, BE_DEVICE_ID2) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(BE_VENDOR_ID, OC_DEVICE_ID1) },
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
