On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Punit Agrawal <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > Will Deacon <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:01:56PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote: >>> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c >>> > index 5a86da9..7af78df 100644 >>> > --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c >>> > +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c >>> > @@ -397,7 +397,8 @@ static irqreturn_t pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void >>> > *dev) >>> > hw_counter = &event->hw; >>> > >>> > /* Did this counter overflow? */ >>> > - if (!pmu_read_register(idx, CCI_PMU_OVRFLW) & >>> > CCI_PMU_OVRFLW_FLAG) >>> > + if (!(pmu_read_register(idx, CCI_PMU_OVRFLW) & >>> > + CCI_PMU_OVRFLW_FLAG)) >>> > continue; >>> >>> >>> Going back to the manual, this fix looks correct. >>> >>> Acked-by: Punit Agrawal <[email protected]> >>> >>> Will, would this go via your tree? >> >> Given that you're happy with it, I don't mind which tree it goes in. >> Probably deserves a CC stable on it too. > > The CCI PMU patches went via arm-soc. Are you happy to pick this fix with > the Ack and a Cc to stable.
Yeah, we've been merging most of the CCI patches. Please resend the patch to [email protected] if you want us to apply it. Thanks, -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
