On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 09:49 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:35:02AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 07:19 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Hi Tim,
> > > 
> > > I think the problem is that sdio.size doesn't get set set with
> > > the new dio code.  Please try the patch below to fix this by not
> > > relying on that field:
> > 
> > Thanks for your quick response.  We'll test this patch and let you
> > know the results.
> 
> There actually was a little bug in it, please try the version below
> instead:
> 

Christoph, we're glad to report that this patch does fix the problem.
Wonder if Al or someone can pick it up.  It is a large regression
that should not be left unfixed for 3.16.

Tim


> 
> diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
> index 194d0d1..17e39b0 100644
> --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ struct dio_submit {
>                                          been performed at the start of a
>                                          write */
>       int pages_in_io;                /* approximate total IO pages */
> -     size_t  size;                   /* total request size (doesn't change)*/
>       sector_t block_in_file;         /* Current offset into the underlying
>                                          file in dio_block units. */
>       unsigned blocks_available;      /* At block_in_file.  changes */
> @@ -1104,7 +1103,8 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb, 
> struct inode *inode,
>       unsigned blkbits = i_blkbits;
>       unsigned blocksize_mask = (1 << blkbits) - 1;
>       ssize_t retval = -EINVAL;
> -     loff_t end = offset + iov_iter_count(iter);
> +     size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter);
> +     loff_t end = offset + count;
>       struct dio *dio;
>       struct dio_submit sdio = { 0, };
>       struct buffer_head map_bh = { 0, };
> @@ -1287,10 +1287,9 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb, 
> struct inode *inode,
>        */
>       BUG_ON(retval == -EIOCBQUEUED);
>       if (dio->is_async && retval == 0 && dio->result &&
> -         ((rw == READ) || (dio->result == sdio.size)))
> +         (rw == READ || dio->result == count))
>               retval = -EIOCBQUEUED;
> -
> -     if (retval != -EIOCBQUEUED)
> +     else
>               dio_await_completion(dio);
>  
>       if (drop_refcount(dio) == 0) {
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to