Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> writes:
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c b/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
> index a8de2ee..fa8077a 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
> @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ static int rsxx_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> card->event_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue(DRIVER_NAME"_event");
> if (!card->event_wq) {
> dev_err(CARD_TO_DEV(card), "Failed card event setup.\n");
> + st = -ENOMEM;
> goto failed_event_handler;
> }
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com>
BTW, just above this there is questionable code:
st = rsxx_get_num_targets(card, &card->n_targets);
if (st)
dev_info(CARD_TO_DEV(card),
"Failed reading the number of DMA targets\n");
card->ctrl = kzalloc(card->n_targets * sizeof(*card->ctrl), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!card->ctrl) {
st = -ENOMEM;
goto failed_dma_setup;
}
>From my reading of the kzalloc code, ZERO_SIZE_PTR (which is 16 cast to
a void *) would be returned from that kzalloc call if the
rsxx_get_num_targets call failed (since you'd be kzalloc-ing 0 bytes).
That would lead to the !card->ctrl check not working, right?
I'd suggest not continuing after rsxx_get_num_targets fails.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
