jump_label_ratelimit.h is split from jump_label.h to enable the
includers who don't want linux/workqueue.h.
As HAVE_JUMP_LABEL is only defined in jump_label.h, will following
patch makes jump_labe_ratelimit.h more tidy?
Compiled and Tested in x86_64
Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouz...@ict.ac.cn>
---
include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
index 089f70f..0d34d7e 100644
--- a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
+++ b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
@@ -4,15 +4,12 @@
#include <linux/jump_label.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
-#if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
+#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
struct static_key_deferred {
struct static_key key;
unsigned long timeout;
struct delayed_work work;
};
-#endif
-
-#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
extern void static_key_slow_dec_deferred(struct static_key_deferred *key);
extern void
jump_label_rate_limit(struct static_key_deferred *key, unsigned long rl);
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
