Yes, that looks good. While at it I grep'd the tree for
'CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL', and found some uses in the
netfilter code which should probably be
'HAVE_JUMP_LABEL' as well.
Thanks,
-Jason
On 08/20/2014 05:29 AM, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> jump_label_ratelimit.h is split from jump_label.h to enable the
> includers who don't want linux/workqueue.h.
> As HAVE_JUMP_LABEL is only defined in jump_label.h, will following
> patch makes jump_labe_ratelimit.h more tidy?
>
> Compiled and Tested in x86_64
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouz...@ict.ac.cn>
> ---
> include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> index 089f70f..0d34d7e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> @@ -4,15 +4,12 @@
> #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> -#if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
> +#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
> struct static_key_deferred {
> struct static_key key;
> unsigned long timeout;
> struct delayed_work work;
> };
> -#endif
> -
> -#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
> extern void static_key_slow_dec_deferred(struct static_key_deferred *key);
> extern void
> jump_label_rate_limit(struct static_key_deferred *key, unsigned long rl);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
