The use of "rcu_assign_pointer()" is NULLing out the pointer.
According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:
"1.   This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"
it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
smaller overhead.

The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
@@
@@

- rcu_assign_pointer
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER
  (..., NULL)

Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <[email protected]>
---
 net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
index abfa0b65..9b64383 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
@@ -1822,7 +1822,7 @@ static void br_multicast_query_expired(struct net_bridge 
*br,
        if (query->startup_sent < br->multicast_startup_query_count)
                query->startup_sent++;
 
-       rcu_assign_pointer(querier, NULL);
+       RCU_INIT_POINTER(querier, NULL);
        br_multicast_send_query(br, NULL, query);
        spin_unlock(&br->multicast_lock);
 }
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to