On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:16:57AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:55:58AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > Added by ac1bea85781e (sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() report RCU quiescent > > > states), removed by 4a81e8328d379 (rcu: Reduce overhead of cond_resched() > > > checks for RCU). So, as you say, no effect on contemporary kernels. > > > > Well not sure what to make out of all of this.... > > Yep, still confused as to how the patch adding the definition could have > caused a failure. Fengguang, any thoughts?
Yeah this is confusing.. I checked carefully and find that commit 0e98023 and afea227 are built on 2 quite different servers -- which might generate slightly different code. I'll fix this issue and make the build server selection more consistent. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/