On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:56:25 +0900 Ryusuke Konishi
<konishi.ryus...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> From: Andreas Rohner <andreas.roh...@gmx.net>
>
> This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use of
> msync(), sync() and a clean unmount of the file system. It is easily
> reproducible with the following script:
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
> @@ -219,10 +219,10 @@ static int nilfs_writepage(struct page *page, struct
> writeback_control *wbc)
>
> static int nilfs_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
> {
> + struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> int ret = __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
>
> if (page_has_buffers(page)) {
> - struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> unsigned nr_dirty = 0;
> struct buffer_head *bh, *head;
>
> @@ -245,6 +245,10 @@ static int nilfs_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
>
> if (nr_dirty)
> nilfs_set_file_dirty(inode, nr_dirty);
> + } else if (ret) {
> + unsigned nr_dirty = 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - inode->i_blkbits);
It's quite cosmetic, but it is conventional to use PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
