I think that all manipulations on memcg_caches array must happen where
it is defined, i.e. on the slab side. The array allocation and
relocation paths as well as elements access follow this pattern (see
e.g. cache_from_memcg_idx, memcg_update_all_caches), but elements update
doesn't. We still want to setup new array elements in memcontrol.c (see
memcg_{un,}register_cache), though it may change in the future. Anyway,
let's introduce a simple function for updating the array entries,
cache_install_at_memcg_idx, to match cache_from_memcg_idx.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   15 ++++-----------
 mm/slab.h       |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 412fa220b9aa..9ae2627bd3b1 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3018,15 +3018,8 @@ static void memcg_register_cache(struct mem_cgroup 
*memcg,
        css_get(&memcg->css);
        list_add(&cachep->memcg_params->list, &memcg->memcg_slab_caches);
 
-       /*
-        * Since readers won't lock (see cache_from_memcg_idx()), we need a
-        * barrier here to ensure nobody will see the kmem_cache partially
-        * initialized.
-        */
-       smp_wmb();
-
-       BUG_ON(root_cache->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id]);
-       root_cache->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = cachep;
+       BUG_ON(cache_from_memcg_idx(root_cache, id) != NULL);
+       cache_install_at_memcg_idx(root_cache, id, cachep);
 }
 
 static void memcg_unregister_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
@@ -3043,8 +3036,8 @@ static void memcg_unregister_cache(struct kmem_cache 
*cachep)
        memcg = cachep->memcg_params->memcg;
        id = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
 
-       BUG_ON(root_cache->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] != cachep);
-       root_cache->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = NULL;
+       BUG_ON(cache_from_memcg_idx(root_cache, id) != cachep);
+       cache_install_at_memcg_idx(root_cache, id, NULL);
 
        list_del(&cachep->memcg_params->list);
 
diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
index 52b570932ba0..da798cfe5efa 100644
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -201,12 +201,31 @@ cache_from_memcg_idx(struct kmem_cache *s, int idx)
        /*
         * Make sure we will access the up-to-date value. The code updating
         * memcg_caches issues a write barrier to match this (see
-        * memcg_register_cache()).
+        * cache_install_at_memcg_idx()).
         */
        smp_read_barrier_depends();
        return cachep;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Update the entry at index @memcg_idx in the memcg_caches array of
+ * @root_cache. The caller must synchronize against concurrent updates to the
+ * same entry as well as guarantee that the memcg_caches array won't be
+ * relocated under our noses.
+ */
+static inline void cache_install_at_memcg_idx(struct kmem_cache *root_cache,
+                               int memcg_idx, struct kmem_cache *memcg_cache)
+{
+       /*
+        * Since readers won't lock (see cache_from_memcg_idx()), we need a
+        * barrier here to ensure nobody will see the kmem_cache partially
+        * initialized.
+        */
+       smp_wmb();
+
+       root_cache->memcg_params->memcg_caches[memcg_idx] = memcg_cache;
+}
+
 static inline struct kmem_cache *memcg_root_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
 {
        if (is_root_cache(s))
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to