On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:44:37 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:

> __lock_task_sighand() does local_irq_save() to prevent the potential
> deadlock, we can use preempt_disable() with the same effect. And in
> this case we can do preempt_disable/enable + rcu_read_lock/unlock only
> once outside of the main loop and simplify the code. This also shaves
> 112 bytes from signal.o.
> 
> With this patch the main loop runs with preemption disabled, but this
> should be fine because restart is very unlikely: it can only happen if
> we race with de_thread() and ->sighand is shared. And the latter is only
> possible if CLONE_SIGHAND was used without CLONE_THREAD, most probably
> nobody does this nowadays.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/signal.c |   31 +++++++++++++------------------
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 8f0876f..61a1f55 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1261,30 +1261,25 @@ struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct 
> task_struct *tsk,
>                                          unsigned long *flags)
>  {
>       struct sighand_struct *sighand;
> -
> +     /*
> +      * We are going to do rcu_read_unlock() under spin_lock_irqsave().
> +      * Make sure we can not be preempted after rcu_read_lock(), see
> +      * rcu_read_unlock() comment header for details.
> +      */
> +     preempt_disable();

The sad part is, this is going to break -rt. Or is this something we
can have preempt_disable_nort() with (for the -rt kernel that is). That
is, is -rt susceptible to this deadlock as well?

-- Steve


> +     rcu_read_lock();
>       for (;;) {
> -             /*
> -              * Disable interrupts early to avoid deadlocks.
> -              * See rcu_read_unlock() comment header for details.
> -              */
> -             local_irq_save(*flags);
> -             rcu_read_lock();
>               sighand = rcu_dereference(tsk->sighand);
> -             if (unlikely(sighand == NULL)) {
> -                     rcu_read_unlock();
> -                     local_irq_restore(*flags);
> +             if (unlikely(sighand == NULL))
>                       break;
> -             }
>  
> -             spin_lock(&sighand->siglock);
> -             if (likely(sighand == tsk->sighand)) {
> -                     rcu_read_unlock();
> +             spin_lock_irqsave(&sighand->siglock, *flags);
> +             if (likely(sighand == tsk->sighand))
>                       break;
> -             }
> -             spin_unlock(&sighand->siglock);
> -             rcu_read_unlock();
> -             local_irq_restore(*flags);
> +             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sighand->siglock, *flags);
>       }
> +     rcu_read_unlock();
> +     preempt_enable();
>  
>       return sighand;
>  }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to