On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:59:21 -0500 Yoder Stuart-B08248 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Kim Phillips [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:53 AM > > > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:49:38 -0500 > > "J. German Rivera" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > CHANGE HISTORY > > > > > > Issues pending resolution not addressed by v2: > > > - What to do with Doxygen comments in patch 1 > > > > It's clear they should be removed. > > > > > - Whether to move or not FSL-specific header files added in include/linux, > > > by this patch series, to another location > > > > there wasn't a valid objection against moving them under fsl/ and > > changing them to use dashes instead of underscores, was there? > > There was no objection, but here is the observation. The current > convention seems to be that under include/linux are 'subsystem' > types-- > include/linux/mmc > include/linux/spi > include/linux/raid > etc > > There is no other "company" that has an include/linux/[company-name] that I > can > see. Freescale seems to be the only one. And there is only a single driver > in there. So it looks like a complete anomaly. > > Why is that? > > I guess we could try moving our stuff to incluce/linux/fsl and see if there is > any negative feedback on it. these two commits: commit 9a32299 "powerpc, dma: move bestcomm driver from arch/powerpc/sysdev to drivers/dma" commit 3946860 "mxs-dma : move the mxs dma.h to a more common place" create/update files in include/linux/fsl for the same reason as this patchseries wants, i.e., in order to support multiple drivers including the files, and in an arch- (and mach-) independent manner. hth, Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
