Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:45:32PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> From: Kevin Hilman <khil...@linaro.org>
>> 
>> Allow debugfs override of sched_tick_max_deferment in order to ease
>> finding/fixing the remaining issues with full nohz.
>> 
>> The value to be written is in jiffies, and -1 means the max deferment
>> is disabled (scheduler_tick_max_deferment() returns KTIME_MAX.)
>> 
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@linaro.org>
>
> So, I'm worried that it becomes a hack that everybody uses to shutdown
> the tick completely then nobody will come and fix the issue that prevents
> from doing it properly.

OK.

> I seriously doubt this will be used for development purpose to help
> fixing the real problem. 

Well, that's what I was using it for, until I was distracted by other
tasks.

> Quite the opposite. If developers want to do
> testing, they can as well comment out the call to 
> scheduler_max_tick_deferment().

OK, fair enough.

Thanks,

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to