It is not necessary to setup config.ena_gpio with -EINVAL or similar.
This patch removes these unnecessary initializations.

Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 1 -
 drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c            | 2 --
 2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c 
b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
index c879dff597ee..d7455ee309bf 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
@@ -509,7 +509,6 @@ static int pfuze100_regulator_probe(struct i2c_client 
*client,
                config.init_data = init_data;
                config.driver_data = pfuze_chip;
                config.of_node = match_of_node(i);
-               config.ena_gpio = -EINVAL;
 
                pfuze_chip->regulators[i] =
                        devm_regulator_register(&client->dev, desc, &config);
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
index d258e6613831..2c7817f12516 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
@@ -949,8 +949,6 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                config.driver_data = s5m8767;
                config.regmap = iodev->regmap_pmic;
                config.of_node = pdata->regulators[i].reg_node;
-               config.ena_gpio = -EINVAL;
-               config.ena_gpio_flags = 0;
                if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->regulators[i].ext_control_gpio))
                        s5m8767_regulator_config_ext_control(s5m8767,
                                        &pdata->regulators[i], &config);
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to