From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:23:28 +0300

> You used __netif_subqueue_stopped but that seems to use
> a slightly more expensive test_bit internally.

More expensive in what sense?  It should be roughly the same
as "x & y" sans the volatile.

Anyways I'm ambivalent and I want to see this bug fixes, so I'll
apply your patch.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to