On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:51:12AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 07:20:49AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 03:49:43PM +0200, Philip Munksgaard wrote: > > > Fix a style issue > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Philip Munksgaard <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c > > > index d1a3f60..d88998d 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c > > > @@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ static const struct usb_device_id option_ids[] = { > > > { USB_DEVICE(TLAYTECH_VENDOR_ID, TLAYTECH_PRODUCT_TEU800) }, > > > { USB_DEVICE(LONGCHEER_VENDOR_ID, FOUR_G_SYSTEMS_PRODUCT_W14), > > > .driver_info = (kernel_ulong_t)&four_g_w14_blacklist > > > - }, > > > + }, > > > > Why not fix the same 'space' issue on the line before this at the same > > time? > > And what about the remaining white-space issues in this file? Do we > really want to go down this path?
No, we don't, if you want to have patches be able to apply properly to older kernels, as you point out. Just don't add new whitespace issues please, that's all. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
