On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:45:40PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> +static void pt_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
> +{
> + struct pt *pt = this_cpu_ptr(&pt_ctx);
> + struct pt_buffer *buf = perf_get_aux(&pt->handle);
> +
> + if (pt_is_running() || !buf || pt_buffer_is_full(buf, pt) ||
> + pt_config(event)) {
> + event->hw.state = PERF_HES_STOPPED;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ACCESS_ONCE(pt->handle_nmi) = 1;
> + event->hw.state = 0;
> +
> + pt_config_buffer(buf->cur->table, buf->cur_idx,
> + buf->output_off);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_STATUS, 0);
> + pt_config_start(true);
> +}
That's two RTIT_CTL writes, should we not try and merge those?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
