On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:15:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:22:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +#define __wait_event_freezable(wq, condition)
> > \
> > + (void)___wait_event(wq, condition, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, 0, \
> > + schedule(); try_to_freeze())
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * wait_event - sleep until a condition gets true or freeze (for kthreads)
> > + * @wq: the waitqueue to wait on
> > + * @condition: a C expression for the event to wait for
> > + *
> > + * The process is put to sleep (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE -- so as not to
> > contribute
> > + * to system load) until the @condition evaluates to true. The
> > + * @condition is checked each time the waitqueue @wq is woken up.
> > + *
> > + * wake_up() has to be called after changing any variable that could
> > + * change the result of the wait condition.
> > + */
> > +#define wait_event_freezable(wq, condition)
> > \
> > +do {
> > \
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)); \
> > + might_sleep(); \
> > + if (condition) \
> > + break; \
> > + __wait_event_freezable(wq, condition); \
> > +} while (0)
> > +
> > #define __wait_event_timeout(wq, condition, timeout)
> > \
> > ___wait_event(wq, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition), \
> > TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, timeout, \
>
> Bah, that doesn't compile, because there already appears to be one,
> hidden in freezer.h. Now I can't actually tell if it does the same thing
> or not.
>
> Rafael?
Ping?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
