On Wednesday 29 October 2014 08:46:00 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2014 20:58:52 Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> > 
> >         irq_gc_lock(gc);
> >         /* Save the current mask and the interrupt forward mask */
> > -       b->saved_mask = __raw_readl(b->base) | b->irq_fwd_mask;
> > +       b->saved_mask = __raw_readl(b->base + IRQEN) | b->irq_fwd_mask;
> >         if (b->can_wake) {
> >                 reg = b->saved_mask | gc->wake_active;
> > -               __raw_writel(reg, b->base);
> > +               __raw_writel(reg, b->base + IRQEN);
> >         }
> >         irq_gc_unlock(gc);
> >  }
> > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void bcm7120_l2_intc_resume(struct irq_data *d)
> >  
> >         /* Restore the saved mask */
> >         irq_gc_lock(gc);
> > -       __raw_writel(b->saved_mask, b->base);
> > +       __raw_writel(b->saved_mask, b->base + IRQEN);
> >         irq_gc_unlock(gc);
> > 
> 
> You should really change this one too, to use fixed-endian accessors.
> __raw_writel can't safely be used in drivers, and it will break
> big-endian kernels running on ARM BRCMSTB.

As you already fix this in patch 6, please disregard my comment above,
your patch looks ok.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to