On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 12:55:14AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:45:47AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, October 20, 2014 11:04:46 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > @@ -198,8 +217,10 @@ static int amba_probe(struct device *dev)
> > > pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > >
> > > ret = pcdrv->probe(pcdev, id);
> > > - if (ret == 0)
> > > + if (ret == 0) {
> > > + pcdev->irq_safe = pm_runtime_is_irq_safe(dev);
> >
> > This looks racy.
> >
> > Is it guaranteed that runtime PM callbacks won't be run for the device
> > after pcdrv->probe() has returned and before setting pcdev->irq_safe?
> > If not, inconsistent behavior may ensue.
>
> You are absolutely correct. So that knocks that idea on its head.
Actually, I think we shouldn't give up hope here. Currently, we do this:
pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
ret = pcdrv->probe(pcdev, id);
What we could do is:
pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
ret = pcdrv->probe(pcdev, id);
if (ret == 0) {
pcdev->irq_safe = pm_runtime_is_irq_safe(dev);
pm_runtime_put(dev);
break;
}
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
which would ensure that we hold a usecount until after the probe function
has returned. Would that work?
I'll give you that it's pretty horrid.
Would another possible solution be to remember the irq-safeness in the
suspend handler, and use that in the resume handler? Resume should
/always/ undo what the suspend handler previously did wrt clk API stuff.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
