3.2.64-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>

commit 614a80e474b227cace52fd6e3c790554db8a396e upstream.

In the early days, we had some special handling for the
KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC exit, but this was gone in 2009 with commit
d7b0b5eb3000 (KVM: s390: Make psw available on all exits, not
just a subset).

Now this switch statement is just a sanity check for userspace
not messing with the kvm_run structure. Unfortunately, this
allows userspace to trigger a kernel BUG. Let's just remove
this switch statement.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 13 -------------
 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -516,16 +516,6 @@ rerun_vcpu:
 
        BUG_ON(vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int.local_int[vcpu->vcpu_id] == NULL);
 
-       switch (kvm_run->exit_reason) {
-       case KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC:
-       case KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN:
-       case KVM_EXIT_INTR:
-       case KVM_EXIT_S390_RESET:
-               break;
-       default:
-               BUG();
-       }
-
        vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask = kvm_run->psw_mask;
        vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr = kvm_run->psw_addr;
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to