On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:47:32AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > The call to arch_scale_frequency_capacity in the rt scheduling path might be > a concern for RT folks because I'm not sure whether we can rely on > arch_scale_freq_capacity to be short and efficient ?
Well, you put it in quite a hot path on the CFS side too, so it had better be blazing fast anyhow. That said, can you move all the running + invariance bits at the beginning of the patch set, these appear to be the least controversial bits and 'desired' by quite a few people, so we'll try and get those agreed upon and merged first. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
