On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:05:48AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 05 November 2014 16:39:21 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:52:19PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Wednesday 22 October 2014 16:59:14 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:38:45AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > The arm32 implementations of pci_domain_nr/pci_proc_domain can > > > > > probably be > > > > > removed if we change the arm32 pcibios_init_hw function to call the > > > > > new > > > > > interfaces that set the domain number. > > > > > > > > I wished, but it is a bit more complicated than I thought unfortunately, > > > > mostly because some drivers, eg cns3xxx set the domain numbers > > > > statically in pci_sys_data and this sets a chain of dependency that is > > > > not easy to untangle. I think cns3xxx is the only legacy driver that > > > > "uses" > > > > the domain number (in pci_sys_data) in a way that clashes with the > > > > generic domain_nr implementation, I need to give it more thought. > > > > > > Just had a look at that driver, shouldn't be too hard to change, see > > > below. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > > > This patch is in my patchwork, but it lacks a topic & changelog and I'm not > > sure of its state, so I'm going to drop it for now. Please post it again > > if you want me to do something with it. I guess it only touches arch/arm, > > so it would probably be merged via your tree anyway. > > Lorenzo has posted an updated version as > > "arm: cns3xxx: pci: remove artificial dependency on pci_sys_data domain", > and a second patch that depends on it. That is the version we should be > merging, though I'm not sure through which tree.
I am posting a v2 shortly, let's discuss the best way to merge it then. Thanks, Lorenzo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
