On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:30:29PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > So what I somewhat dislike about this patch is that notify_change() is > sometimes called with dentry and sometimes with path. That way it's not > completely clear when fanotify events will be generated and when not. > Sadly it isn't easy to provide struct path in all the places where we are > calling notify_change() so I'm not sure what would a better solution look > like either :(
I suspect the right thing to do is to split out the truncate path from notify_change, as it's fairly different anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
