On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote: > > But I don't want to move pcie_cap_has_lnkctl() to pci.h and leave > pcie_cap_has_sltctl() and pcie_cap_has_rtctl() in access.c. They're all > related, so I think they should stay together. > > What if we left them in access.c, made them non-static, non-inline, and > just added prototypes to pci.h? Or I guess we could add a prototype just > for pcie_cap_has_lnkctl(), since that's the only one we need so far.
Ok, will have another version that add only prototype for pcie_cap_has_lnkctl() to pci.h Thanks Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
