On Thursday, October 30, 2014 10:24 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> 
> Now that we have moved to generic phy based bindings,
> we don't need to have any code related to older dptx-phy.
> Nobody is using this dptx-phy anymore, so removing the
> same.

Right, older dptx-phy was replaced long time ago.
However, it was not removed for DT compatibility.
I think that now these old DT properties can be removed.

I added some comments below.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vi...@samsung.com>
> Cc: Inki Dae <inki....@samsung.com>
> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes from V1:
>  - Reworked error handling in exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata() as commented
>    by Inki.
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c |   67 
> ++++++++-----------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h |    2 -
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> index cd50ece..206163b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> @@ -1052,28 +1052,14 @@ static int exynos_dp_create_connector(struct 
> exynos_drm_display *display,
> 
>  static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
>  {
> -     if (dp->phy) {
> +     if (dp->phy)
>               phy_power_on(dp->phy);
> -     } else if (dp->phy_addr) {
> -             u32 reg;
> -
> -             reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr);
> -             reg |= dp->enable_mask;
> -             __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr);
> -     }
>  }
> 
>  static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
>  {
> -     if (dp->phy) {
> +     if (dp->phy)
>               phy_power_off(dp->phy);
> -     } else if (dp->phy_addr) {
> -             u32 reg;
> -
> -             reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr);
> -             reg &= ~(dp->enable_mask);
> -             __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr);
> -     }
>  }
> 
>  static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display)
> @@ -1212,40 +1198,13 @@ static struct video_info 
> *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev)
> 
>  static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
>  {
> -     struct device_node *dp_phy_node = of_node_get(dp->dev->of_node);
> -     u32 phy_base;
> -     int ret = 0;
> -
> -     dp_phy_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy_node, "dptx-phy");
> -     if (!dp_phy_node) {
> -             dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp");
> -             return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dp->phy);
> -     }
> -
> -     if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "reg", &phy_base)) {
> -             dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get reg for dptx-phy\n");
> -             ret = -EINVAL;
> -             goto err;
> -     }
> -
> -     if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "samsung,enable-mask",
> -                             &dp->enable_mask)) {
> -             dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get enable-mask for dptx-phy\n");
> -             ret = -EINVAL;
> -             goto err;
> -     }
> -
> -     dp->phy_addr = ioremap(phy_base, SZ_4);
> -     if (!dp->phy_addr) {
> -             dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to ioremap dp-phy\n");
> -             ret = -ENOMEM;
> -             goto err;
> +     dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp");
> +     if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) {
> +             dev_err(dp->dev, "no DP phy configured\n");
> +             return PTR_ERR(dp->phy);
>       }
> 
> -err:
> -     of_node_put(dp_phy_node);
> -
> -     return ret;
> +     return 0;
>  }
> 
>  static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_panel(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
> @@ -1278,8 +1237,16 @@ static int exynos_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct 
> device *master, void *data)
>               return PTR_ERR(dp->video_info);
> 
>       ret = exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(dp);

In your patch, exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata() calls only devm_phy_get().
Then, how about calling devm_phy_get() directly and removing
exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata()? It looks simpler.

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> -     if (ret)
> -             return ret;
> +     if (ret) {
> +             /*
> +              * phy itself is not enabled, so we can move forward
> +              * assigning NULL to phy pointer.
> +              */
> +             if (ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -ENODEV)
> +                     dp->phy = NULL;
> +             else
> +                     return ret;
> +     }
> 
>       if (!dp->panel) {
>               ret = exynos_dp_dt_parse_panel(dp);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h
> index a1aee69..6426201 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h
> @@ -153,8 +153,6 @@ struct exynos_dp_device {
>       struct clk              *clock;
>       unsigned int            irq;
>       void __iomem            *reg_base;
> -     void __iomem            *phy_addr;
> -     unsigned int            enable_mask;
> 
>       struct video_info       *video_info;
>       struct link_train       link_train;
> --
> 1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to