On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:19:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 12 November 2014 11:13:52 Will Deacon wrote: > > Just do arm64. We already have the dedicated request for arch/arm/. > > I wonder if we should define NT_ARM64_SYSTEM_CALL to the same value > as NT_S390_SYSTEM_CALL (0x307), or even define it as an architecture- > independent NT_SYSTEM_CALL number with that value, so other architectures > don't have to introduce new types when they also want to implement it.
That would be a sane thing to do, so that tools which want to get at this information can do in an almost standardised way for architectures implementing this method. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
