> From: Joe Perches [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 1:33 PM > To: Wang, Yalin > Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'linux- > [email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'linux- > [email protected]' > Subject: Re: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 > > On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:16 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote: > > Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array. > > > > This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit > > reversals to eliminate the array. > > This one is already in -next > > commit 7a1283d8f5298437a454ec477384dcd9f9f88bac > Author: Joe Perches <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Oct 28 14:18:58 2014 -0700 > > carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 > > Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array. > > This allows some architectures with hardware instructions > for bit reversals to eliminate the array. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]> > Got it , So I need wait for your another patch to be accepted.
Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
