On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:36:55 -0500, kan liang wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
>
> Currently, there are two call chain recording options, fp and dwarf.
> Haswell has a new feature that utilizes the existing LBR facility to
> record call chains. So it provides the third options to record call
> chain. This patch enables the lbr call stack support.
>
> LBR call stack has some limitations. It reuses current LBR facility, so
> LBR call stack and branch record can not be enabled at the same time. It
> is only available for user callchain.
> However, LBR call stack can work on the user app which doesn't have
> frame-pointer or dwarf debug info compiled. It is a good alternative
> when nothing else works.


[SNIP]
>  static void
> -perf_evsel__config_callgraph(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> +perf_evsel__config_callgraph(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> +                          struct record_opts *opts)
>  {
>       bool function = perf_evsel__is_function_event(evsel);
>       struct perf_event_attr *attr = &evsel->attr;
>  
>       perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, CALLCHAIN);
>  
> +     if (callchain_param.record_mode == CALLCHAIN_LBR) {
> +             if (!opts->branch_stack) {
> +                     perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, BRANCH_STACK);
> +                     attr->branch_sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER |
> +                                             PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL_STACK;
> +                     if (attr->exclude_user) {
> +                             attr->exclude_user = 0;
> +
> +                             pr_warning("LBR callstack option is only 
> available"
> +                                        " to get user callchain information."
> +                                        " Force exclude_user to 0.\n");
> +                     }

I'm not sure what's in a higher priority - maybe I missed earlier
discussion.  IOW what about this?

                        if (attr->exclude_user) {
                                pr_warning("LBR callstack option is only 
available"
                                           " to get user callchain 
information.\n");
                        } else {
                                perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, BRANCH_STACK);
                                attr->branch_sample_type = 
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER |
                                                        
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL_STACK;
                        }

> +             } else
> +                      pr_info("Cannot use LBR callstack with branch 
> stack\n");

It seems pr_warning is more appropriate here.

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +     }
> +
>       if (callchain_param.record_mode == CALLCHAIN_DWARF) {
>               if (!function) {
>                       perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, REGS_USER);
> @@ -659,7 +676,7 @@ void perf_evsel__config(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct 
> record_opts *opts)
>       }
>  
>       if (callchain_param.enabled && !evsel->no_aux_samples)
> -             perf_evsel__config_callgraph(evsel);
> +             perf_evsel__config_callgraph(evsel, opts);
>  
>       if (target__has_cpu(&opts->target))
>               perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, CPU);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to