On 12/03/14 17:25, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:38:55PM +0000, Andrew Jackson wrote:
> 
>>      case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP:
>>      case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND:
>>      case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH:
>> -            dev->active--;
>> +            if (dev->active > 0)
>> +                    dev->active--;
> 
> How is this triggering - this sounds like you're papering over some
> other bug somewhere?
> 

When I looked at the code paths I couldn't convince myself that STOP wouldn't 
be called more than once.  Then actuve would be negative and the device might 
not be restartable.  I didn't have a problem per se, it was just that it seemed 
to be something of a loophole.

   Andrew

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to