On 12/03/14 17:25, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:38:55PM +0000, Andrew Jackson wrote: > >> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP: >> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND: >> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH: >> - dev->active--; >> + if (dev->active > 0) >> + dev->active--; > > How is this triggering - this sounds like you're papering over some > other bug somewhere? >
When I looked at the code paths I couldn't convince myself that STOP wouldn't be called more than once. Then actuve would be negative and the device might not be restartable. I didn't have a problem per se, it was just that it seemed to be something of a loophole. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/