Hi Mark, On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:17:14PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > >> Seem like this issue is not specific to the da9052 regulator. > >> On a imx6q-wandboard we can see the internal anatop regulators being >> probed on linux-next 20141031: >> http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20141031/wandboard-arm-imx_v6_v7_defconfig.html >> >> [ 0.072014] vdd1p1: 800 <--> 1375 mV at 1100 mV >> [ 0.073027] vdd3p0: 2800 <--> 3150 mV at 3000 mV >> [ 0.073933] vdd2p5: 2000 <--> 2750 mV at 2400 mV >> [ 0.074888] vddarm: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1150 mV >> [ 0.075935] vddpu: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1150 mV >> [ 0.076897] vddsoc: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1200 mV > >> ,but since next-20141103 they do not probe anymore: >> http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20141103/wandboard-arm-imx_v6_v7_defconfig.html > > That last log looks *extremely* unhappy in general, I can't actually see > any references to attempts to do regulator things and there's lots of > backtraces in there. AFAICT those regulators are anatop regulators and > I can't find references to that driver or anything called "vdd".
Yes, so here is a cleaner one: http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20141104/wandboard-arm-imx_v6_v7_defconfig.html The anatop regulators is drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c and the dt description is at: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi On 20141104 they are not getting probed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
