On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:40:40PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Still not seeing any references to either pfuze100 or vdd (other than > > the external audio CODEC)... > Exactly, that's the bug :-) My point is that I'm not seeing anything complaining about those devices or the supplies they offer so nothing there indicates to me that there's any kind of problem. > If we compare it against next-20141031: > http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20141031/wandboard-arm-imx_v6_v7_defconfig.html > [ 0.052239] CPU identified as i.MX6Q, silicon rev 1.2 > [ 0.072014] vdd1p1: 800 <--> 1375 mV at 1100 mV > [ 0.073027] vdd3p0: 2800 <--> 3150 mV at 3000 mV > [ 0.073933] vdd2p5: 2000 <--> 2750 mV at 2400 mV > [ 0.074888] vddarm: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1150 mV > [ 0.075935] vddpu: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1150 mV > [ 0.076897] vddsoc: 725 <--> 1450 mV at 1200 mV Remember that these messages are now at debug level.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
