On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 06:27:43AM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
> @@ -568,8 +568,8 @@ struct event_constraint 
> intel_atom_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
>  };
>  
>  struct event_constraint intel_slm_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
> -     /* UOPS_RETIRED.ALL, inv=1, cmask=16 (cycles:p). */
> -     INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x108001c2, 0xf),
> +     /* INST_RETIRED.ANY_P */
> +     INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0x1),

Should that not be:
        INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x108000c0, 0x1),

instead?

>       /* Allow all events as PEBS with no flags */
>       INTEL_ALL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0, 0x1),
>       EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to