Hi Changman,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Changman Lee [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 11:20 PM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim; Changman Lee; [email protected]; 
> [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: use ra_meta_pages to simplify 
> readahead code in
> restore_node_summary
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is there any reason to use truncate_inode_pages_range instead of
> invalidate_mapping_pages?
> IMHO, it seems nice to just use invalidate_mapping_pages because pages
> of meta_inode shouldn't be dirty, locked, under writeback or mapped in
> this function.
> If there is my misunderstanding, let me know.

I think you're right, I use truncate_inode_pages_range because just following 
the
usage of readahead-invalidate pair in recovery flow, but without considering the
difference between them.

I will fix this as you suggested.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Changman Lee <[email protected]>

And thanks for your review! :)

Regards,
Yu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to