Hello.
Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > On 14/09/28, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > > > (Q2) Does auxiliary record work with only type=SYSCALL case? > > > > > > Auxiliary records don't work with AUDIT_LOGIN because that record has a > > > NULL context. Similarly for core dumps (AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND), AUDIT_SECCOMP, > > > configuration changes (AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE, AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE), most > > > (all?) AUDIT_USER_* messages. > > > > > I see, thank you. > > > > Although I feel that, from the point of view of troubleshooting, emitting > > history of thread's comm name into NULL-context records would help sysadmin > > to map login session and operations a user did from that login session, > > I'm OK with starting history of thread's comm name as auxiliary records > > (i.e. not emitted into NULL-context records). > > > > Adding LKML for reviewers. What else can I do for merging this patch? > > I'm willing to take it with some reflection and no significant > objections, in particular from userspace audit. I'll have a closer look > at it. > Any comments on this patch? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/