rq->clock{,_task} are serialized by rq->lock, verify this.
One immediate fail is the usage in scale_rt_capability, so 'annotate'
that for now, there's more 'funny' there. Maybe change rq->lock into a
raw_seqlock_t?
(Only 32bit is affected)
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5945,8 +5945,8 @@ static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(i
*/
age_stamp = ACCESS_ONCE(rq->age_stamp);
avg = ACCESS_ONCE(rq->rt_avg);
+ delta = __rq_clock_broken(rq) - age_stamp;
- delta = rq_clock(rq) - age_stamp;
if (unlikely(delta < 0))
delta = 0;
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -687,13 +687,20 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq
#define cpu_curr(cpu) (cpu_rq(cpu)->curr)
#define raw_rq() raw_cpu_ptr(&runqueues)
+static inline u64 __rq_clock_broken(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ return ACCESS_ONCE(rq->clock);
+}
+
static inline u64 rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
return rq->clock;
}
static inline u64 rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq)
{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
return rq->clock_task;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
