On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:19:38 +0100 Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 07:16:39PM +0800, Wang Nan wrote: > > Hi Jiri, > > > > I found that only this patch is not enough. When converting such > > tracepoints, > > it uses add_tracepoint_fields_values(..., struct format_field *fields ...), > > and fields->name is still the original one. > > > > If 'struct format_field' has a field like 'dup_name' we can make things > > simpler. > > However, struct format_field is part of traceevent, not only used by perf. > > > > I have no enough time to think on it. Jiri, could you please give me some > > hints > > so I can implement another patch tomorrow? > > yea, looks like we either need to add 'void *priv' into 'struct format_field' > or if Steven doesn't like it, we'd need to save 'our' field name in some way > so it's reachable via format_field::name string. > > Steven, > we need to use changed format_field::name to interface babeltrace > library, because it has restriction that fields within tracepoint > should have unique names. > > Any chance we could introduce 'void *priv' member to format_field::name ? > Maybe with 'destroy_priv' callback to be called when the field is destroyed. > > I can provide patch, just wanted to know first if you're not strictly against > ;-) > I'm not exactly sure what the issue is. I guess I need to see a patch to understand better. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
